Daniel Masur vs Preston Stearns Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Stearns has shown superior performance on their second serve, winning 49.53% of points in the last six months compared to Masur’s 42.74%. Could this be a decisive factor in the match outcome?
• In return game statistics, Masur is marginally better at winning opponent’s second serve points, with a 45.44% success rate compared to Stearns’ 44.23%.
• Looking at first serve returns, Stearns edges out Masur with 29.39% over Masur's 26.7%, potentially giving Stearns a competitive advantage.
• Under pressure, Stearns has demonstrated resilience by saving 64.52% of breakpoints, whereas Masur has managed only 47.98%.
• Over the past year, Stearns has had a win percentage of 50%, while Masur's stands at 44.9%. Does Stearns have the statistical upper hand overall?
• Stearns prefers indoor hard courts with a win rate of 43%, but struggles on clay with no wins recorded. Masur performs best on hard surfaces with a 56% win rate.
• Stearns has primarily competed at lower-level tournaments with a 40% success rate, while Masur has contested larger events, achieving a slightly higher win percentage of 46.67%.
• In terms of opponent quality, Stearns has faced rivals with an average rank of 320, while Masur’s opponents had an average rank of 387.49.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Stearns will likely have the advantage, having won 43% of such sets compared to Masur’s 25%.
• During breakpoint opportunities, Stearns converts 40.82% while Masur only manages 33.57%, which could be crucial in critical moments.

Editorial Prediction (September 16, 2025, UTC):

As we assess the head-to-head statistics between Stearns and Masur, patterns begin to emerge that may predict the likely outcome of their upcoming tennis match.

Stearns' ability to win points on their second serve and outperform Masur in return percentages places them in a favorable position. Additionally, Stearns’ higher breakpoint conversion rate and superior performance under pressure suggest a mental edge during pivotal game moments.

Despite Masur’s experience against lower-ranked opponents, Stearns' consistency in deciding sets and overall higher-quality opposition faced solidify their footing as the stronger contender.

Considering these factors, Stearns appears to have the statistical advantage and is more likely to come out victorious in this match.